Abstract
This article adopts a hybrid, epistemic design research approach, combining critical reflexivity, conceptual modeling, and contextual grounding to produce testable educational models. It proposes systemic didactic reconfiguration that goes beyond pedagogy and andragogy, establishing an algorithmic framework aligned with local realities. In response to the proliferation of educational methodologies disconnected from the Tunisian context, we question how accreditation, certification, and curricular reform mechanisms impose external norms that freeze knowledge rather than foster its emergence. Our approach seeks to integrate contextual parameters, climatic, sensorial, socio-economic, and territorial, into didactic modeling; to move beyond the pedagogy/andragogy divide toward learning deeply rooted in local specificities; and to transform accreditation and certification systems into catalysts for pedagogical innovation rather than instruments of compliance. Drawing on systemic and complexity-based thinking, we introduce two algorithms, ASA (Adaptive Systemic Algorithm) and TRA (Transposition Reconfiguration Algorithm), along with an integrated solution, D2PR (Designer of Didactic Parameters Remedies). A key innovation of D2PR lies in its explicit incorporation of real-world institutional and budgetary constraints through the POL-CONST (Political-Constraint Simulator) module. The Tunisian case, characterized by rich geo-cultural diversity, serves as a prototype for a post-hegemonic epistemic design, reimagining teaching as a collective act of co-invention oriented toward intellectual emancipation rather than institutional conformity.
References
Adam, B. (2006). Time. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00635.x
Andreotti, V. O., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2021). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization : Indigeneity, Education & Society, 10(1), 21–40.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043064
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway : Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Ben Romdhane, H., & Boughzala, M. (2021). Réformes éducatives en Tunisie post-2011 : Entre discours et réalités. Revue tunisienne des sciences sociales, 58(2), 45–67.
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory : Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Biesta, G. (2022). The risk of education : Embracing uncertainty in teaching and learning. Bloomsbury Academic.
Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33–115.
Brousseau, G. (1998). Théorie des situations didactiques. La Pensée Sauvage.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. La Pensée Sauvage.
Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique du savoir savant au savoir enseigné (2e éd.). La Pensée Sauvage.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux. Éditions de Minuit.
Al-Fassi, A. (s. d.). Al-Didaktik : Mafahim wa muqarabat [La didactique : concepts et approches]. École supérieure des enseignants, Université Abdelmalek Essaâdi.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Houssaye, J. (1988). Le triangle pédagogique. Éditions ESF.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive : Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (Eds.). (2021). Envisioning critical race praxis in education. Teachers College Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social : An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Morin, E. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe. ESF Éditions. https://doi.org/10.3917/esf.morin.1990.01
Parr, P., & Van der Westhuizen, G. (2023). Algorithmic governance in education : Between personalisation and standardisation. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2152936
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South : Justice against epistemicide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621576
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries : A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together : A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark :/48223/pf0000379705
Von Foerster, H. (1979). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In K. Krippendorff (Ed.), Communication and control in society (pp. 5–14). Gordon and Breach.
Zembylas, M. (2024). Affective justice and epistemic disobedience in postcolonial education. Emotion, Space and Society, 50, 101035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2023.101035

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Hafedh GAHA, CSP. Dir. Ghazi ABOUDA, Dr. Ing. G. Noureddine Laghmardi

